Burn the Deck
John Brunswick

How Storytellers Win When Everyone Else Sounds the Same

Structure for Clarity

AI-empowered buyers expect pre-digested insights delivered in clean formats. Structure your content to match their compressed research cycles.

5 m read
Hot Take
Key Takeaway

TL;DR

Complexity kills deals. Your prospect's brain is already overloaded-they've consumed dozens of vendor pitches, analyst reports, and competitor comparisons. The seller who wins isn't the one with the best features; it's the one who makes sense of the chaos. This chapter teaches you to structure information so it sticks: rhythm, contrast, and frameworks that turn dense content into digestible insights. When you make things simple, you make yourself essential.

Even an energetic and well-spoken presenter can find it challenging to communicate complex materials succinctly. Thankfully there are strategies to apply structure and increase the digestibility of your content.

Buyers now expect quick, concise answers and insights on demand. What used to be a multi-month process involving analyst reports and vendor comparisons is now being compressed into hours, sometimes minutes. Your content structure must match this new pace.

The FUST Framework

Structure your content like scenes in a movie. For each key concept, follow this rhythm:

Why Your Brain Demands Structure

Your working memory can only hold about 4-7 chunks of information at once. This is a hard biological limit. When you exceed this capacity with complexity without structure, your audience's brain starts dropping information to make room.

Cognitive load research shows that presentations exceeding working memory capacity trigger a predictable pattern: initial engagement, then confusion, then disengagement, then nothing sticks.

One sales engineer who crammed 47 slides into 30 minutes discovered her audience remembered only a single joke and one timeline detail-everything else was lost to cognitive overload.

Structure reduces cognitive load. When you group related concepts, establish clear hierarchies, and provide signposts ('There are three key points...'), you help the audience's brain efficiently chunk information. Each chunk becomes a container they can carry, rather than 47 loose facts scattering in the wind.

Why This Works: Cognitive Load Theory

Cognitive load theory tells us that our working memory has limited capacity. If a presentation is packed with complex, unstructured information, the audience's brain may overheat and start tuning things out.

Research shows people forget approximately 50-80% of new information within 24 hours unless it's reinforced (the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve). Structure and repetition combat this natural decay.

When you respect cognitive limits by keeping things clear and focused, you actually earn the right to delve into details because the audience trusts that you won't lose them. In contrast, confusion and complexity are engagement-killers.

The brain needs signals of what's important-so use techniques like summary headlines, repetition of your key point, and strong openings/closings (leveraging the primacy and recency effects, whereby people best remember the first and last parts of a talk).

Rhythm & Contrast

Rhythm & Contrast

Hollywood has famously pioneered some of the most adrenaline producing, fast-paced action films. However, even with the best special effects, it isn't possible to maintain high engagement for extended durations purely through continuous high speed chases and explosions.

The "quiet before the storm" is an essential part of this formula, not only amplifying the impact of the wow moments, but giving you a chance to build anticipation about what comes next. In fear of your audience disengaging, you might attempt to power through a presentation riding a wave of high energy. But like the best action films, pacing is critical to ensuring that your energy adds to the experience instead of dominating it.

Think about each key concept you present like a scene from a movie. Package each key chapter, segment, or scene using the techniques outlined on the right: frame, unpack, summarize, and transition.

Frame

Take a moment to set the stage for the segment, just as the "quiet before the storm". This helps anchor your audience to what you are about to share, priming them with "why" this next concept or topic is important to them.

Unpack

Once set, dive in with your passion and unpack the concept - this is your car chase.

Summarize

After it has been unpacked, take a moment to slow down and summarize. This should be reflected in not only your talk track, but the visuals that accompany it, making your content significantly more understandable. Doing this achieves two critical goals - it provides a rhythm that allows people to anticipate and synchronize with your delivery. It also helps each concept boldly stand out, instead of being one of dozens or concepts strung together.

Transition

It is easy to omit this all together, but a planned transition can help reengage your audience, keep things flowing smoothly and boost the emphasis of an upcoming section. This can make the difference between audiences feeling effortlessly transported between sections or a disjointed experience that requires constant effort to understand what you are sharing.

Why This Works: Attention Management

Adult attention spans for passive listening typically wane after 10-15 minutes. By breaking content into segments with clear beginnings and endings, you reset attention.

The FUST framework mirrors how our brains naturally process information: context (frame), detail (unpack), consolidation (summarize), and anticipation (transition).

Each transition serves as a mental 'palette cleanser'-giving the audience a moment to process and prepare for the next concept. Without transitions, presentations feel like a firehose of disconnected information.

Research on adult learning shows that when content is chunked with clear structure, learners report higher engagement and better retention-even when the actual information volume is identical.

Simplification

Simplification with Grouping and Hierarchy

Why are great infographics so compelling? They naturally force structure and as a result express ideas in a way that simplifies complex data, providing a quick understanding and memorable experience. How can this inform the way you shape your content?

You just got notified that you have to deliver an important presentation next week. In an effort to get moving, you grab a relevant presentation template or prior deck on the topic, updating the logos, names on the introduction slide, and including some form of thank you toward the end. You copy and paste a variety of existing slides that feel relevant or that you particularly enjoy presenting on the topic. You sandwich this collection of content between the introduction and thank you. This progress feels good and lowers your stress levels. This is the reality of how most presentations take shape, but what happens next will have an enormous impact on the experience of your audience.

Many people now begin to refine and tinker with each slide, moving text, adding images. This is a mistake. At this point you have an opportunity to stand back from the collection of content and think about structure. Just because you are using a slide deck and not an infographic, does not mean you cannot replicate their approach.

Just as with rhythm and contrast, taking the time to aggressively organize content in related groups and in a hierarchy can have powerful results, even when the content itself remains largely the same. It takes content that is correct and makes it significantly more digestible, reducing the cognitive load for your audience in receiving the information.

The effort placed into thinking through how you group your content helps crystallize your thinking about how the concepts relate to each other. Your talk track naturally improves. You can then return to the fun of finding punchy bits of visual media to support your message.

Why This Works: Visual Hierarchy

The picture-superiority effect is well-established in cognitive science: people remember images significantly better than words. Why? Because when you show a clear visual, the audience's brain stores it in two forms-the image itself and a verbal label for it. Words alone get stored only as language. This dual encoding means visuals stick in memory far longer than text.

Well-designed visuals also prevent cognitive overload by offloading some processing to the visual channel, rather than forcing the audience to only process dense verbal information.

On the flip side, text-dominated slides or spreadsheets overload working memory-the infamous 'Death by PowerPoint.' When people are faced with walls of text or numbers while also listening to a speaker, their brain splits attention and often ends up retaining very little.

As presentation experts advise: 'Avoid cluttered slides, and use imagery to amplify your message-your audience's working memory can't handle reading and listening at the same time.' The bottom line: show, don't just tell.

Next
Engineering Memorable Moments

References

Behavioral science research supporting this chapter

1
Sweller, J. (1988)
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Key Finding: Working memory can only hold 4-7 chunks of information at once; exceeding this capacity triggers confusion and disengagement
Application: Structure reduces cognitive load by helping audiences efficiently chunk information
Related to: Working memory limits and cognitive load
2
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885)
Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology
Key Finding: People forget approximately 50-80% of new information within 24 hours unless reinforced (the forgetting curve)
Application: Structure and repetition combat natural memory decay
Related to: Working memory limits and cognitive load
3
Wade, L. (2025)
Cognitive Overload in Presentations
Key Finding: Presentations exceeding working memory capacity trigger a pattern: initial engagement, confusion, disengagement, then nothing sticks
Application: Respect cognitive limits to earn the right to delve into details
Related to: Working memory limits and cognitive load
4
Murdock, B.B. (1962)
The Serial Position Effect of Free Recall
Key Finding: People best remember the first (primacy) and last (recency) parts of a presentation
Application: Use strong openings and closings to leverage natural memory patterns
Related to: Primacy and recency effects
5
Knowles, M.S. (1984)
Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning
Key Finding: Adult attention spans for passive listening wane after 10-15 minutes; breaking content into segments resets attention
Application: The FUST framework (Frame, Unpack, Summarize, Transition) mirrors how brains naturally process information
Related to: FUST Framework for attention management
6
Various Cognitive Psychology Research (2020)
Information Chunking and Learning
Key Finding: When content is chunked with clear structure, learners report higher engagement and better retention-even with identical information volume
Application: Each transition serves as a mental 'palette cleanser' for the audience
Related to: FUST Framework for attention management
7
Nielsen Norman Group (2020)
Picture Superiority Effect in UX Design
Key Finding: People remember images significantly better than words due to dual encoding-the brain stores visuals as both image and verbal label
Application: Show, don't just tell; visuals prevent cognitive overload by offloading processing to the visual channel
Related to: Visual hierarchy and picture superiority
8
Paivio, A. (1971)
Imagery and Verbal Processes
Key Finding: Dual coding theory: information presented both verbally and visually is encoded twice, leading to better retention
Application: Well-designed visuals stick in memory far longer than text alone
Related to: Visual hierarchy and picture superiority