Burn the Deck
John Brunswick

How Storytellers Win When Everyone Else Sounds the Same

Think Buyer First

Identify and break "content-first" habits, reframe your message with an audience-first mindset

3 m read
Hot Take
Key Takeaway

TL;DR

Your prospect cares their problems first and your product second. Stop presenting like you're defending a thesis and start thinking like their trusted advisor. This chapter rewires your brain from content-first (what you want to say) to audience-first (what they need to hear). Master this mindset shift and you'll stop being just another vendor demo.

Before rolling up our sleeves, it is helpful to run a pre-flight check on our presentation mindset. Some common orthodoxies can diminish our ability to connect more deeply with our audiences. Let's take a moment to reflect on these assumptions and how they can inadvertently shape our approach, then uncover opportunities to avoid the challenges they present.

Audience-First, Not Content

Think about a recent series of meetings you attended and mentally rewrite the agenda, leading with the "why" of each section rather than the what. This would likely influence how you frame and deliver each section, improving people's ability to quickly understand the value within.

To deliver the highest level of engagement, step back from your content and think through the lens of your audience . The content serves them, not the other way around. Make it accessible .

Break the "Book Report" Habit

The first time most of us presented to an audience was likely in school. These experiences rewarded the correctness of content - there were seldom points for audience engagement and retention. There was also an implicit expectation that our teacher and classmates would listen to what we were sharing - quite the opposite from the world of business .

In today's content rich world, we need to assume that everyone is sharing the correct content and to stand out, we need to reach beyond .

Share at the Right Depth

Small adjustments transform a conversation from "smart person with interesting ideas" to "helpful guide to success."

Take time to ensure that the depth of what you share is aligned to your audience's perspective . They will be most interested in how your solution helps them succeed with what they are responsible for. Make sure that your materials relate directly to their specific challenges and goals and if you mention lower or higher level details, tie them back to the goals of the people you are sharing with .

Use an empathetic approach to place yourself in the shoes of those you are sharing with and if you believe that your idea, product or service can help them, start with their perspective in order to open the door to a better path. If this door isn't open, they cannot walk through.

Next
What Will They Say?

References

Behavioral science research supporting this chapter

1
Norman, D.A. (1988)
The Design of Everyday Things
Key Finding: Design must align with human psychology; when products confuse people, it's a design flaw
Application: Audience-first presentation design parallels user-centered design principles
Related to: Think through the lens of your audience
2
Batson et al. (1997)
Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel
Key Finding: Imagine-other perspective-taking generates more empathy than imagine-self approaches
Application: Validates focusing on audience perspective rather than self-perspective
Related to: Think through the lens of your audience
3
Galinsky et al. (2008)
Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations
Key Finding: Perspective-taking enhances communication by providing common ground for engagement
Application: Understanding audience perspective improves communication effectiveness
Related to: Think through the lens of your audience
4
Camerer et al. (1989)
The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis
Key Finding: Better-informed agents cannot ignore private information even when it's in their interest; they fail to predict how less-informed agents will judge situations
Application: Explains why experts default to content-first approaches that don't resonate with novices
Related to: School rewarded correctness, not engagement
5
Newton, L. (1990)
Overconfidence in the communication of intent: Heard and unheard melodies
Key Finding: Tappers predicted 50% success rate; listeners achieved only 2.5% (3 of 120 songs)
Application: Demonstrates gap between expert knowledge and audience understanding
Related to: School rewarded correctness, not engagement
6
Nathan et al. (2003)
Expert blind spot among preservice teachers
Key Finding: Advanced subject matter knowledge creates 'expert blind spots'-views aligning with expert organization rather than learner needs
Application: Expertise can interfere with effective communication to non-experts
Related to: School rewarded correctness, not engagement
7
Clark et al. (1991)
Grounding in communication
Key Finding: Successful communication requires establishing mutual knowledge, beliefs, and assumptions
Application: Presenters must calibrate to audience's existing knowledge base
Related to: Align depth to audience perspective
8
Ambrose et al. (2010)
How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching
Key Finding: Experts develop 'unconscious competence'-no longer aware of intermediate steps they skip
Application: Presenters must consciously unpack automatic expertise for audiences
Related to: Align depth to audience perspective
9
Stephens et al. (2010)
Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication
Key Finding: Speaker and listener brain activity becomes spatially and temporally coupled during storytelling
Application: Stories literally synchronize brains between speaker and audience
Related to: Storytelling as foundational skill